Another torrid week for President Zuma

(in the pic - President Zuma, Mrs Bongi Zuma, Parliament Speaker Baleka Mbete and NCOP Chairperson TGhandi Modise arriving). President Jacob Zuma delivering his State of the Nation Address in the joint sitting of the house in Parliament, Cape Town, 11/02/2016, Elmond

(in the pic - President Zuma, Mrs Bongi Zuma, Parliament Speaker Baleka Mbete and NCOP Chairperson TGhandi Modise arriving). President Jacob Zuma delivering his State of the Nation Address in the joint sitting of the house in Parliament, Cape Town, 11/02/2016, Elmond

Published Feb 13, 2016

Share

When President Zuma swept down the red carpet and into the National Assembly, no amount of pomp and circumstance could disguise that he was taking a political battering, writes William Saunderson-Meyer.

Flypasts, 21-gun salutes, and ostentatious fashion statements by preening MPs. The annual opening of Parliament with its presidential State of the Nation Address is one of those political rituals that has always mattered more to the participants than it does to the ordinary citizen.

Joe Soap mostly paid the pomp and platitudes little attention. After all, in a year’s time the promises will likely have proved, again, to be just so much hot air.

That was until last year, the first address after the May 2014 general election in which the EFF won their first seats and burst into the hallowed halls of Parliament, turning everything topsy-turvy.

The most memorable aspect to 2014’s address had been a minister who inexplicably chose to dress up as an SAA pilot. But 2015 was a humdinger – red-overalled EFF MPs being forcibly removed from the chamber by the police, flying fists, a walkout by opposition MPs, the “inadvertent” jamming of the cellphone signal in the parliamentary precincts, and a video blackout by the public broadcaster of the rowdiest moments.

Against that dramatic backdrop, this year’s speech was always going to be closely watched, albeit only for the entertainment it might provide. But public interest was further stimulated by a growing sense of national crisis, and the consequent need for President Jacob Zuma for just this once to provide some inspirational leadership.

There was also the reality that while much was hoped for of Zuma, he would enter the National Assembly arena politically weaker than he has been at any time since being fired by former president Thabo Mbeki in 2005. Zuma had recently made a series of political miscalculations that damaged his country, his party and himself.

It started with the firing of Finance Minister Nhlanhla Nene and then, in the face of a currency meltdown, a humiliating climb-down. Then, last week, hoping to avoid similar humiliation in the Constitutional Court, he backtracked on two years of intransigence, suddenly offering to pay back some portion of the state expenditure on his Nkandla home.

The ploy failed and the EFF and the DA insisted on the hearing going ahead, infelicitously timed for the ANC in the very week of the address. Since Zuma appears, at least on the surface, to be impervious to embarrassment, one does not know how much his U-turn on Nkandla and the powers of the Public Protector has cost him.

There is no doubt, though, that the U-turn – the result, as his counsel Jeremy Gauntlett diplomatically explained the dawning of the light, of Zuma experiencing “incremental clarity” on the issues – has cost his most loyal ANC lieutenants dearly. After doing everything to defend and exonerate the Nkandla expenditure, they now had to hear him concede that all the other Nkandla investigations put in place by them on his instructions, were not only invalid – “heat and dust”, in Gauntlett’s words – but that Zuma also accepted that the cabinet ministers involved in the controversy should be reprimanded, and that this should be part of the court’s order.

Nkandla had “traumatised the nation”, said Gauntlett and Zuma now admitted that he had to obey the Public Protector’s findings. But his team urged the court not to be “inveigled into… making some form of wide, condemnatory order, which will be used effectively for… impeachment in Parliament”.

So when Zuma swept down the red carpet and into the National Assembly on Thursday night for his speech, no amount of pomp and circumstance could disguise that this was a man taking a political battering. Outside in the streets, riot police kept protesters under control with razor wire and the occasional stun grenade.

Inside the chamber, Zuma’s only protection was the Speaker, Baleka Mbete’s, nifty but procedurally suspect footwork in suspending the parliamentary rules on points of order, to try to prevent the EFF from constantly interrupting the president’s address. The ploy was only partly successful, with the address running an hour late and the Congress of the People and the EFF eventually walking out, with EFF leader Julius Malema having found a new moniker with which to torment Zuma: Mr Zupta, referring to the president’s controversial relationship with the wealthy Gupta family.

Against such a backdrop of high drama, the speech was perhaps doomed to be a damp squib. Zuma might be a singing sensation when he belts out Awulethe umshini wami – Bring me my machine gun – at ANC gatherings, but he is a lacklustre public speaker.

And the speech’s content, largely focused on the economy in the hopes of saving South Africa from an imminent credit ratings downgrade, didn’t help him. There was nothing much new and while the sentiments expressed would meet with broad investor approval, there was no new sense of urgency to persuade the sceptics that this time around the government would not only talk, but also act.

* Saunderson-Meyer’s Jaundiced Eye column appears in Independent Media titles every Saturday. Follow WSM on Twitter @TheJaundicedEye

** The views expressed here are not necessarily those of Independent Media.

Related Topics: